Parents today face a critical challenge: how to raise independent, ethical adults in a world of competing extremes. On one side are helicopter parents, hovering over their children, managing every detail to ensure success but unintentionally stifling their growth. On the other side, some parents embrace the idea of their children’s moral superiority and total autonomy, giving them the reins but leaving them without the necessary guidance to develop responsibility and resilience. Both approaches fail to strike the balance children need. The key lies in understanding how to provide structure, moral guidance, and autonomy in a way that nurtures both independence and accountability.

The goal of parenting should not simply be to raise a successful individual but to cultivate a young adult who is a critical thinker, capable of navigating life with autonomy and moral clarity. True success lies not only in external accomplishments but in the ability to cooperate with others, solve problems ethically, and engage compassionately in society. Developing these qualities requires a deliberate, structured approach that balances autonomy with moral and ethical guidance. Children’s early developmental stages make them incapable of fully exercising the freedom of choice that we often associate with maturity.

Growing up in a family with few boundaries, I experienced firsthand how confusing it can be for a child when philosophical consistency is lacking. My parents, though well-meaning, embodied two contradictory forces: my mother, a free spirit who embraced minimal structure, and my father, a seemingly mild-mannered man who hid his moral failings behind a strict religious front. These conflicting examples left me searching for a moral foundation I could trust. As a parent, I realized how critical it is to live what we teach, as children will inevitably detect when our actions and words do not align. Without consistency, children can become disillusioned and confused, unsure of which moral path to follow.

Strengthening Personal Accountability and Moral Internalization

William Glasser’s Choice Theory forms the foundation of many modern parenting approaches, particularly those rooted in the gentle parenting mindset. Glasser’s theory emphasizes the importance of autonomy, asserting that individuals choose their behavior in an attempt to fulfill their fundamental needs, such as love, power, freedom, and fun. This framework works well with adults, fostering non-hierarchical relationships between equals, where mutual respect and personal autonomy are prioritized. However, when applied to children without the necessary structure, it can lead to unintentional consequences. In my own experience as a parent, I discovered that over-reliance on Choice Theory left my younger children struggling with self-absorption and an inability to face adversity. Too much autonomy without boundaries left them unprepared to handle life’s challenges effectively.

Psychological research supports this notion: autonomy is essential for healthy development, but it must be paired with guidance and structure. Self-determination theory suggests that children thrive when they feel competent and connected to others while exercising autonomy . Autonomy alone, without boundaries, can lead to confusion and heightened anxiety in children. Parents must be careful not to overload children with choices before they are equipped to manage them responsibly.

In early moral development, moral internalization plays a key role. Studies show that children internalize rules and develop a conscience when they experience clear, consistent boundaries and consequences . This allows them to transition from following external rules to developing an internal moral compass that guides their behavior. Parents who provide structure help their children learn accountability and understand how their actions affect others, laying the groundwork for future moral reasoning.

The Need for Structure to Foster Resilience

The appeal of this gentle, non-confrontational approach lies in its compassionate appearance. It seems to align with our gentler nature, encouraging empathy and freedom from conflict. Yet, it can actually be uncompassionate in its failure to prepare a child for the world. Absorbing children too deeply in their own choices and dilemmas can lead to heightened anxiety, as they come to overvalue their problems and decisions. Often, we need to shift our attention away from our personal troubles and focus on the well-being of others to alleviate internal rumination. Kochanska’s research on moral development highlights that children with clear guidance and support are more likely to develop resilience and emotional regulation, especially in the face of adversity .

By giving children too many choices or avoiding conflict for the sake of peace, we may teach them that their own problems are far more significant than they truly are. In contrast, adherence to a rote moral code during the early stages of moral development offers a helpful practice. It encourages children to “fake it until they make it”—to focus more on how their behavior impacts others, which can take their minds off their own troubles and promote emotional balance.

During a particularly difficult time in my own parenting journey, I turned to Choice Theory, hoping to empower my children by allowing them greater freedom in making their own decisions. But with my marriage falling apart and tensions running high, this lack of structure actually contributed to my children’s confusion. They learned how to manipulate the situation, pitting their mother and me against each other. Looking back, I can see that we gave them too much autonomy without providing the moral framework needed to handle the challenges of life. Children need boundaries—they need to understand that their actions have consequences, not just for themselves but for those around them.

Moving from Control to Coaching: A Parental Shift

Josh Shipp, author of The Grown Up’s Guide to Teenage Humans, encapsulates this balance well, saying that parents need to transition from being Air Traffic Controllers when their children are young—managing every decision—to becoming Coaches as they grow, guiding them while allowing them to navigate their own lives. This transition reflects the authoritative parenting model, which balances warmth with firm boundaries [oai_citation:1,Authoritative Parenting Style: Characteristics, Impact, and Examples

  – Mental Health Center Kids](https://mentalhealthcenterkids.com/blogs/articles/authoritative-parenting). Parents who shift to a coaching role foster independence while providing support, which ultimately helps children develop the confidence to make responsible decisions.

Teaching Empathy and Cooperation

To guide children toward moral maturity, they need an external framework of ethical instruction. Instead of relying on their limited capacity for moral reasoning, parents should provide structured guidance that fosters personal responsibility and accountability. This approach aligns with Viktor Frankl’s belief, as explored in his seminal work Man’s Search for Meaning, that true meaning in life is found not through self-gratification but through responsibility to others and dedication to a cause greater than oneself. Parents who focus solely on external success—whether it be academics or sports—miss the opportunity to instill this deeper sense of ethical duty in their children.

Parents can help children understand the importance of their actions within a group by encouraging collaborative problem-solving. This teaches them that their behavior affects others and lays the foundation for empathy and cooperation. In this context, children learn that personal achievement is not the ultimate goal but rather a component of a broader, socially responsible mindset. By fostering these qualities early, parents set the stage for their children to develop into adults capable of both autonomy and ethical responsibility.

Why Consistency Matters

Consistency and follow-through are key to establishing credibility and trust with a child. When you say something will happen, and then follow through with that consequence, it reinforces the boundaries you have set. Children learn that your words hold weight and that rules are not arbitrary. This consistency also helps them feel secure within the structure you’ve created, knowing that they can rely on you to act as promised. Over time, this builds trust, as the child understands that their actions have predictable outcomes. This reliability helps them internalize the rules and expectations, which is crucial for developing personal responsibility and moral reasoning.

It also sets the expectation throughout later life that our most valuable and meaningful relationships are based on a foundation of trust, open-hearted sincerity, and a commitment to a high moral code. This will help your children navigate the challenges of choosing friends and companions capable of deep emotional connection. When children understand the importance of trust and consistency in relationships, they are better equipped to build connections that are not only fulfilling but also morally sound.

Conclusion

Ultimately, the goal of parenting should be to raise young adults who are not only capable of critical thinking but also equipped with the emotional and ethical tools necessary for fulfillment. While many parents focus on securing external success for their children, it is the development of internal values—personal accountability, ethical reasoning, and empathy—that will determine their long-term happiness. As Viktor Frankl noted, “Success, like happiness, cannot be pursued; it must ensue… as the unintended side-effect of one’s dedication to a cause greater than oneself.” When parents emphasize these internal values, they help their children develop the resilience and moral clarity necessary for true fulfillment.

Reflecting on my own journey, I can see how my early experiences shaped my parenting philosophy. Growing up without clear boundaries taught me how critical it is to provide children with both structure and empathy. My own missteps as a parent have only reinforced the importance of consistency—in teaching, in discipline, and in living the values we hope to instill in our children. The greatest lesson I’ve learned is that raising autonomous, ethical adults is not about controlling every decision they make or letting them lead entirely—it’s about guiding them with compassion, setting boundaries with care, and ensuring that their personal growth is always framed within a larger context of social responsibility and moral integrity.

By gradually increasing a child’s understanding of responsibility, empathy, and cooperation, we help them grow into compassionate, critical thinkers capable of contributing to a more cooperative and ethical society. These individuals will enter adulthood not only as achievers but as thoughtful, empathetic members of society, equipped to lead fulfilling lives that benefit both themselves and the world around them. The most important lesson parents can teach is not how to win, but how to live well—with integrity, purpose, and compassion.

Appendix: Practical Guide to a Three-Year-Old Testing Parental Boundaries

While the goal of raising autonomous, ethical adults is a long-term process, the foundation is laid early in childhood. As Jordan Peterson notes, it’s important not to raise children whose behavior you dislike. This begins with addressing challenging behaviors in a way that balances autonomy with boundaries, teaching children emotional regulation and personal accountability. Below are practical, psychologically sound approaches to common scenarios with three-year-olds, grounded in authoritative parenting and moral development principles.

Scenario 1: Handling a Public Tantrum

Situation: You’re out shopping, and your three-year-old throws a tantrum because they can’t get what they want. People are staring, and you feel embarrassed.

What to Do:

  • Stay Calm: Model emotional regulation by keeping your tone calm and level. Children pick up on your energy, so staying composed can de-escalate the situation.
  • Acknowledge Feelings: Let the child know you understand their frustration without giving in. “I see you’re upset because you wanted that toy, but we can’t buy it today.”
  • Set Boundaries: Make it clear that tantrums are not acceptable: “It’s okay to be upset, but we don’t scream in the store.”
  • Offer Choices: Empower them by offering two acceptable options: “Would you like to hold my hand or sit in the cart while we finish?”
  • Natural Consequences: If the tantrum continues, explain the consequence: “If you can’t stop screaming, we’ll leave the store.” Follow through calmly.

By handling public tantrums with a calm, clear approach, you teach your child emotional regulation, an essential part of moral internalization.

Scenario 2: Running Off During an Excursion

Situation: During a family outing, your child keeps running off, making it difficult for the group to enjoy the trip.

What to Do:

  • Set Clear Expectations: Before the trip, explain the rules in simple terms: “Today, we need to stay together. It’s important to stay close so we can all have fun.”
  • Natural Consequences: If the child continues to run off, offer a consequence: “If you run off again, you’ll have to hold my hand the rest of the day.”
  • Positive Reinforcement: Praise your child when they stay with the group: “Great job staying close! We can all have more fun when we stay together.”
  • Make It Fun: Turn it into a game to keep them engaged: “Let’s pretend we’re explorers and need to stick together to find the treasure.”

If the child puts themselves in immediate danger, such as running into the street, a swat on the behind may be appropriate—not as a punishment but as a sharp, corrective measure. The goal is to teach the child that certain actions can have dangerous consequences, where immediate and serious intervention is necessary. This is consistent with Peterson’s philosophy of using the minimum necessary force to establish boundaries in life-threatening or high-risk situations .

Scenario 3: Not Sharing Toys and Hitting

Situation: At home, your child refuses to share toys and reacts by hitting or smashing toys when other children try to play.

What to Do:

  • Immediate Intervention: Calmly but firmly stop the behavior: “We don’t hit. Hitting hurts people, and we need to be kind.”
  • Teach Empathy: Ask them how they think the other child feels when hit: “Do you think your friend is sad because you hit them?”
  • Model Sharing: Demonstrate how to take turns: “Let’s share. I’ll play with it for two minutes, then it’s your friend’s turn.”
  • Consequences: If hitting or breaking toys continues, introduce consequences: “If you can’t play nicely, the toys will need to be put away.”

While sharing is difficult for three-year-olds, consistently teaching empathy and personal responsibility is crucial for their social development. By showing them how their behavior impacts others, you lay the groundwork for moral accountability.

Why This Matters:

These real-world scenarios demonstrate how you can implement authoritative parenting principles without resorting to harsh punishment. They help children learn that their actions have consequences, and by handling challenging situations calmly and with clear boundaries, you model emotional regulation—a vital life skill.

By consistently setting boundaries, using positive reinforcement, and guiding children through natural consequences, you help build their empathy and accountability while promoting emotional intelligence. Over time, these strategies foster children who are not only self-reliant but also socially responsible.

  1. Self-Determination Theory and Autonomy in Children:
  • This theory, which emphasizes the importance of autonomy, competence, and relatedness in fostering healthy development, supports your argument that autonomy must be balanced with guidance.
  • Source: Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68-78.
  • Read More
  1. Kochanska’s Research on Moral Development and Emotional Regulation:
  • Kochanska’s work emphasizes how early childhood experiences with discipline and guidance help develop a child’s conscience and emotional self-regulation, laying the groundwork for moral internalization.
  • Source: Kochanska, G., & Aksan, N. (2006). Children’s conscience and self-regulation. Journal of Personality, 74(6), 1587-1617.
  • Read More
  1. Jordan Peterson’s Parenting Philosophy:
  • Peterson often speaks about the necessity of discipline, structure, and minimum necessary force to help children learn responsibility. His philosophy supports the idea of setting boundaries early to avoid raising children whose behavior one dislikes.
  • Source: Peterson, J. B. (2018). 12 Rules for Life: An Antidote to Chaos. Random House Canada.
  • Official Site for Reference
  1. Viktor Frankl’s Emphasis on Moral Responsibility:
  • In Man’s Search for Meaning, Frankl argues that meaning in life comes from moral responsibility and serving something greater than oneself, which aligns with the focus on teaching children ethical responsibility early.
  • Source: Frankl, V. E. (2006). Man’s Search for Meaning. Beacon Press.
  • Official Reference
  1. Authoritative Parenting Model:
  • The authoritative parenting model emphasizes a balanced approach of discipline with warmth and structure, fostering autonomy while maintaining clear expectations and limits.
  • Source: Baumrind, D. (1991). The influence of parenting style on adolescent competence and substance use. Journal of Early Adolescence, 11(1), 56-95.
  • Read More